As I have already admitted before I consider myself lucky in my
choice of car. At the time of purchase I was searching for sporty, good looking
car. If not for this stroke of luck maybe I would be driving something as
useless as Hyndai Coupe (known as Tiburon in States). Mk3 Supra is not the best choice of
turbo car, of course, it's main drawbacks are heavy weight and relatively weak
aftermarket support and hence higher prices on upgrade parts. Modifying
something like more common 4WD Eagle Talon will get you better results for the
money.
Well, back to turbo. Nearly all factory turbocharged engines blessed by high
potential in the horsepower increase area. It is not unusual to see turbo motors
running double or triple factory horsepower output on stock internals. It is not
recommended of course, but possible (for some period of time). Recipe for big
horsepower is to supply certain amount of air to the cylinders and provide
proportional amount of fuel for combustion process. Fuel supply is relatively
simple, when it comes to air supply things become more complicated and more
costly.
First mod for the stock CT26 turbo popular among the beginners is to shim turbo
wastegate (WG) with few washers. Result of this surgery is higher boost
pressure, with too many washers under the WG bracket you can easily hit fuel cut at
12-14psi. Next natural step is installing boost controller. I don't know much
about manual boost controllers, in my opinion they belong to the past. Though I
have read some positive comments from MBC (Manual Bost Controller) users.
Another question asked often is why should I spend $500 on EBC (Electronic Boost
Controller) if I can get the same boost with few washers under the wastegate
bracket. They are
talking
about peak numbers and forget (or are not aware of) linear WG response to the
rise of boost pressure. In plain English it means your wastegate will not snap
open at boost pressure, say 12psi, but starts crack opening from 2-4psi. This
kind of WG behavior has name of boost creep and makes your car feel much slower
than with properly tuned EBC. With EBC you can gain a lot of torque at lower rpm
because it can be tuned to snap open wastegate at predetermined boost level,
even allowing some boost spike. To increase boost safely and to achieve better HP results it is recommended to
get rid of stock downpipe with incorporated first cat in favor of aftermarket 3"
downpipe. This is the best first thing beginner can do to his 7MGTE. Best
downpipe is divorced type, it eliminates restrictive turbo elbow and bolts
directly to the turbo. Good downpipe alone can give you 12-15whp gain easily.
Just remember - restrictive exhaust system is not healthy for your turbo and
cost you horsepower. It absolutely makes no sense on turbo motor trying
different horsepower enhancing mods without having proper exhaust system. Second
stock cat has to be replaced by aftermarket high flow 3" or 4" cat, or test pipe if you
are not law abiding person. Then buy decent 3" catback, anyone of them worth
another 10-12whp increase. If your HP goals big - better buy 4" Goliath catback
from Horsepowerfreaks. Though such large size becomes a necessity after 600whp
it never hurts to have it as big as possible. When I was shopping for catback
there was no 4" on the market and I settled on 80mm Blitz Nur-spec and Random
Technology test pipe. I also used Random Technology downpipe and Suprasport
turbo elbow. There was no such thing as divorced downpipe back in 2000 when I
purchased my exhaust system components. As I said above divorced downpipe gets
you better bang for your buck, it costs less then elbow + stock replacement
downpipe and performs better because wastegated exhaust gas won't collide with
exhaust gas exiting turbo inside the elbow. It flows through the dedicated pipe
which smoothly merges with downpipe about 8-10 inches downstream the turbo.
With stock CT26 and supporting mods you can run 15-17psi of boost and achieve
around 300+whp. Some people are satisfied with this result and keep driving there BPU Supras for years, but if you are real boost freak and think big power-wise
your decision will be to ditch CT26 and jump on bigger turbo. Another
alternative is to upgrade CT26, it can give you power similar to T3/T4, hybrid
turbo in the
range of 450whp. Experienced in car modifications area folks may go straight
from stock to big turbo and supporting mods. You have to ask yourself are you
going to be satisfied with 400whp or maybe you need more? If budget permits go
straight for big numbers, even if your project takes a year or more to be
completed. In the end you save $$$ because you did not spend your time and funds
on half-ass mods (like I did)
When it became clear my stock CT26 was going down I ordered in summer 2001 T3/T4
hybrid turbo from Suprasport. Kit included oil and coolant supply braided hoses,
as well as new oil drain line. Suprasport was offering stage 3 and stage 5
options for their turbos, stage 3 was good for 400+whp, stage 5 - for 500+whp.
Stage 5 was offered also with ball bearing CHRA as a $500 option. Both turbos
had 360 degree thrust bearing which made them more reliable then obsolete 270
degree bearing. Back in 2001 I thought I would be completely satisfied with
400whp and ordered stage 3 kit and Spearco stock replacement intercooler to
complement expected horsepower gain. Stage 3 turbo was just a little more laggy
than CT26 and offered of course much better top end power. My best run was
12.92@115.45 on 1.4
bar boost on that turbo. I used APEXi AVCR and SAFC, Lexus/Riemer upgrade and
Spearco IC.
After driving 3 years on T3/T4 I decided I've had enough and time has come to
move to something bigger power-wise. My biggest concern with bigger turbo was
turbo lag, so definitely I needed ball bearing turbo. I also wanted kind of
plug'n'play solution, in other words turbo kit. I did not want Greddy kit
because I thought T78 was laggy. The only other kit I was aware of was made by
Sound Performance. In 2004 they introduced new line of dual ball bearing
turbochargers and I ordered through Suprasport turbo kit with SPSSGT650WBB
turbocharger, rated 650 hp. As a standard exhaust manifold, turbo and downpipe
come ceramic coated, compressor housing polished, kit included HKS 60mm GT
wastegate. Later I realized 60 mm WG was too big for my horsepower, if I started
it all over again I would better used much lighter (and cheaper) Tial 46 mm WG.
I ordered my kit with open to atmosphere WG because I did not like how SP
connect WG dump pipe at 90 degree angle to the downpipe. Besides, I saved a
pound or two of weight.
Sound Performance don't provide compressor maps for their turbochargers, I would
be very much interested to see map of my compressor. If you are shopping
for the new turbo and manufacturer is able to provide compressor map it is
always good idea to take a pen and calculator and find out how well the turbo
you intend to buy matches your motor flow rate. Very good article scanned from SCC can be found here. It is
written by Mike Kojima, I like his Suck, Squish, Bang, Blow series of tech stuff
in the above magazine.. Besides turbo matching calculation method you will be
able to find many other useful tips on choosing turbo.
Below are few pictures of my turbo kit installed. I am supporter of using heat
insulation on turbo, used it on my old T3/T4 and continue using it on my new
turbo. Ceramic coating supposed to help in heat insulation area, but I decided
additionally to add Thermo Tec heat wrap on exhaust manifold and downpipe. I put
turbo
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
blanket on my turbo as well. These little things help keep heat
away from engine bay and theoretically reduce lag due to more heat
retained in the exhaust.
If you intend to use heat insulation don't go to the extremes, do not
overinsulate, follow instruction included with the product.
Now few words about performance. I installed turbo kit along with many other
power enhancing goodies, like Greddy 3-row IC, custom front facing intake
manifold with short runners and last but not least AEM EMS. So far at the time
of writing (March 2006) I drove only 3500km on new turbo. I am new to
programmable EMS tuning, so progress was quite slow. Now my fuel and ignition
maps close to optimal and I can say this turbo is amazing, I am on full boost
between 3500 and 3700 rpm, about the same as far less potential T3/T4. My boost
control was off, I tuned my EMS on WG spring pressure 0.9 bar. I am sure when I
set up my boost control response will be even more quicker. Smallish 0.68 A/R of
gas side contributes a lot to quick turbo spool, but at the cost, of course, of
high end power. Updates will follow
when I am back home this summer.
In summer 2009 I received Y2K 80mm turbo
which I ordered from SIP few months before. I was planning to stroke my 7M and
was thinking about ~78mm turbo capable to crack magic 1000hp figure. At that
time Turbonetics discontinued YK 78mm, and 80mm was smallest in this series. I
know about two 7M motors running this turbo, both in Malta - one with 88mm on
the street driven through the Powerglide mk3 Supra, second one on Mibrum Racing
dragster pushing 1200+hp. This is pure race turbo, 1200hp, undivided T6, 0.96
A/R, huge
exhaust wheel, 4.5' V-band outlet, oil only cooled.
To spool it I need good exhaust manifold and large size downpipe and exhaust.
My fabricator friend Soara made great
![]() |
|
![]() |
long runner manifold and 5' downpipe for me. Runner length is equally long 90cm, close to 3 ft. Long runners help to effectively isolate exhaust pulses and reduce blow-across effect between cylinders. Blow-across happens when one cylinder is in blow-down phase (exhaust valve opening releases high pressure exhaust charge into the runner), another in very sensitive valve overlap period. Main disadvantage of long runners is higher heat loss (need very good thermo insulation), and I don't like sharp 90 degree bends either, but this is the only way to accommodate such manifold in my engine bay. There is no way I can remove this manifold when motor in the engine bay, have to pull the motor first, then manifold.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Above is the picture of my 5' downpipe, I asked guys doing work on car's body to cut the firewall to fit this downpipe. I have full 4' catless exhaust based on ETS catback. I ordered it with Aero Turbine resonated muffler. After removing my old 80 mm Blitz Nur-spec I found ETS catback more quit then very loud Blitz. Everybody knows, the larger exhaust size, the louder it is. I think Aero Turbine muffler does it's job very well. Additionally I asked to add custom made resonator and additional small 60mm bypass muffler and 4' throttle body. Throttle body is actuated by lever on driveshaft tunnel. If I pull the lever it closes throttle body and exhaust gas passes through the 60 mm bypass muffler - resonator - 4' muffler. Helps a lot to cut down noise level. Though the system is heavy :(
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
And finally I want to comment on exhaust size vs. horsepower subject. I have heard many times and truly believed that 4' exhaust needed only for 600+ whp motors. I put this 4' exhaust when I still had small 61 mm turbo. Downpipe was 3' size, rest of the system 4'. I found instant gain of 20-25 whp. My car never was on dyno, I use AEM Log math feature to draw torque and whp graph. Previously in good air I saw average 450-460 peak whp at 1.3 bar boost pressure. After installing new 4' exhaust my idle rpm went ~100 rpm up (I have no idle control valve, it is set by screw on the throttle body) and I had to increase fuel in my VE table around 5% because car was running leaner. My AEM Log peak whp went to ~480. This is quite big VE gain.